Equating electronegativity to the negative of the chemical potential is neither valid nor useful, as this definition leads to results that are incompatible with chemical experience. A more effective approach, which gives results in overall agreement with Pauling's values, is to relate electronegativity to the average valence electron ionization energies of atoms.

Abstract

There continues to be confusion concerning the concept of electronegativity. Pauling's original approach, focusing upon an atom in a molecule, continues to be widely invoked. There has also been a more recent tendency to view electronegativity as the negative of the chemical potential and to extend it to molecules. However, this leads to results that are incompatible with chemical experience. A more effective approach, which gives results in overall agreement with Pauling's values, is to relate electronegativity to the average valence electron ionization energies of atoms.