On Who Should Pay When Orbital Debris “Trickles-Down” in a Tragedy of the Low Earth Orbit Commons

In March 2023, NASA released the most rigorous and wide-reaching orbital debris analysis in the space law literature that provides a cost-benefit analysis of removing orbital debris from low Earth orbit (LEO), a region of the Earth’s environment with no environmental regulation. NASA contextualized the motivation in releasing this report as rooted in the exponential growth of the commercial satellite industry, noting that “the number of tracked and untracked debris in LEO is projected to grow . . . even if no new satellites are launched into space, yet launch traffic is likely to increase in the coming decade compared to recent history.” Similarly, in a May 2023 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report, the CBO argued that the “number of satellites operating in LEO has increased significantly in recent years, driven in large part by commercial [satellite] constellations,” which are networks of identical satellites whose orbits and positions are coordinated to accomplish a given mission, such as providing global broadband internet.

Underscoring the dangers of launching thousands of satellites into a finite orbital space with no environmental regulation, SpaceX, who operates the world’s largest constellation, Starlink, reported that from December 2022 to May 2023, Starlink had to perform 25,299 collision avoidance maneuvers in LEO. This number of collision avoidance maneuvers is double the number of maneuvers reported by SpaceX during the previous six-month period, which is alarming to industry experts. Concerning the risks that satellite constellations pose to the sustainability of LEO, experts note that the global space market grew by 8% to $424 billion in 2022 and is expected to be valued at more than $737 billion by 2030, which is a market that will certainly be impacted if LEO is enshrouded in an impenetrable maelstrom of orbital debris moving at speeds seven times faster than a bullet.

Cross-referencing the most current orbital debris numbers from the European Space Agency with NASA’s estimated costs of $300 per debris removed with ground-based lasers, and $6,000 per debris removed with space-based lasers, the total estimated cost to remove the 1,036,500 trackable pieces of orbital debris from LEO is from $310 million to $6.2 billion. On the other hand, the cost to remove the estimated 130 million pieces of currently untraceable orbital debris from LEO is from $39 to $780 billion, all of which is a sizeable liability for the United States (U.S.) government to allocate to the U.S. taxpayer. Indeed, under both the Outer Space Treaty and the Proposed ORBITS Act of 2023, which is a bipartisan bill recently unanimously passed by the U.S. Senate, the U.S. taxpayer will be left with footing the bill for remediating the debris left behind by U.S.-authorized commercial satellite operators.

Describing the LEO environment as a classical “tragedy of the commons” and drawing from studies conducted by NASA, the Government Accountability Office, the CBO, United Nations, and others, the purpose of this article is to tackle the question of who should pay when orbital debris “trickles down” in a manner that compromises Earth’s satellite-reliant infrastructure and otherwise causes damage to Earth’s environment, persons, and property. This article then recommends specific language to amend Title III of the Communications Act of 1934, which created and charged the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with regulating commercial satellite systems, to establish a satellite constellation “orbital use fee” (OUF), which the FCC will levy as a requirement for receiving a license to operate in LEO. This OUF will then fund orbital debris remediation projects, related research, and remediation of the environmental impacts of satellite constellations.

Given that the U.S. leads the world in the total number of satellites in space per country, and SpaceX will own more satellites than each country in the world combined once it fully deploys Starlink, this article concludes by arguing that the U.S. is uniquely positioned to engage its allies in forging the foundation of customary international space law. First, through passing into law the types of model legislation provided in this article, which will then form the basis of bilateral and multilateral treaty negotiations with both current and potential space-faring nations. This legislative and diplomatic strategy will help to operationalize the 1967 Outer Space Treaty (OST) proclamation establishing space as the “province of all mankind,” and promote its peaceful use and exploration for the “benefit and in the interests of all countries.”

The U.K.’s ‘Appetite’ for Space: An Increased Craving!

Launching into space was once the pursuit of super-power nations, who, during a period of international tensions, competed to be the first—the first into space and the first to the Moon. While the United Kingdom (U.K.) had a similar appetite it never achieved a space launch from its national soils, often thwarted by political and economic constraints. This said, the U.K. has played a key role, working alongside other nations in technological advancements related to space. This paper revisits the historical legacy of the U.K.’s space ventures and its space policies before comment is made to the current strategy and future vision. The approach is interdisciplinary and factors in semi-quasi case studies, particularly factoring in the European Space Agency. The findings are that the U.K. is returning to its original goal, with a renewed appetite to be a global leader in space launches, while also aiming to protect national interests which have necessitated closer alignment of the civil and defense space strategies.

To Kill a Mockingbird: Bentham and Locke in Gambat, Pakistan

Asian Journal of Management Cases, Ahead of Print.
Set in a rural, tribal district of Pakistan in the 1990s, this case examines the tension between utilitarian and libertarian principles faced by public administrators in their everyday work. The settlement of a bloody tribal feud hinged upon returning a young girl who had recently married a man from another tribe to her parents. Ahsan, the area administrator, must decide whether to forcibly return the girl to her tribe for immediate remarriage or to let her go with her husband. His dilemmas differ from those that the senior officials face, and this divergence is at the root of the failure to control the feud administratively. To comply with orders and pursue a career, public officials, in this case, their personal kindness notwithstanding, adopt strategies that have extreme consequences for citizens. Evil is more banal than we think.

JTAER, Vol. 18, Pages 2217-2232: Consumer Intentions to Switch On-Demand Food Delivery Platforms: A Perspective from Push-Pull-Mooring Theory

JTAER, Vol. 18, Pages 2217-2232: Consumer Intentions to Switch On-Demand Food Delivery Platforms: A Perspective from Push-Pull-Mooring Theory

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research doi: 10.3390/jtaer18040111

Authors: I-Chiu Chang Win-Ming Shiau Chih-Yu Lin Dong-Her Shih

With a burgeoning market and a multitude of on-demand food delivery (OFD) platforms offering diverse options, comprehending the reasons that drive consumers to switch between platforms is paramount. The push-pull-mooring (PPM) theory provides a comprehensive framework for assessing why and how consumers navigate, guiding strategic decisions for service providers seeking to optimize their offerings and retain their customer base. This research employs the PPM theory to rigorously analyze how these elements influence consumers’ intentions to switch between OFD platforms in Taiwan. Findings from a comprehensive survey of 441 OFD users reveal that both pull and mooring factors exert a significant influence on consumers’ inclination to switch platforms, collectively explaining about 42% of the switching intention. Recognizing these critical factors empowers managers to make judicious decisions aimed at enhancing platform offerings and refining marketing strategies, ultimately fortifying customer retention and bolstering satisfaction levels.

JTAER, Vol. 18, Pages 2188-2216: A Brief Survey of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for E-Commerce Research

JTAER, Vol. 18, Pages 2188-2216: A Brief Survey of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for E-Commerce Research

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research doi: 10.3390/jtaer18040110

Authors: Xue Zhang Fusen Guo Tao Chen Lei Pan Gleb Beliakov Jianzhang Wu

The rapid growth of e-commerce has significantly increased the demand for advanced techniques to address specific tasks in the e-commerce field. In this paper, we present a brief survey of machine learning and deep learning techniques in the context of e-commerce, focusing on the years 2018–2023 in a Google Scholar search, with the aim of identifying state-of-the-art approaches, main topics, and potential challenges in the field. We first introduce the applied machine learning and deep learning techniques, spanning from support vector machines, decision trees, and random forests to conventional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, generative adversarial networks, and beyond. Next, we summarize the main topics, including sentiment analysis, recommendation systems, fake review detection, fraud detection, customer churn prediction, customer purchase behavior prediction, prediction of sales, product classification, and image recognition. Finally, we discuss the main challenges and trends, which are related to imbalanced data, over-fitting and generalization, multi-modal learning, interpretability, personalization, chatbots, and virtual assistance. This survey offers a concise overview of the current state and future directions regarding the use of machine learning and deep learning techniques in the context of e-commerce. Further research and development will be necessary to address the evolving challenges and opportunities presented by the dynamic e-commerce landscape.

JTAER, Vol. 18, Pages 2163-2187: COVID-19 and Supply Chain Disruption Management: A Behavioural Economics Perspective and Future Research Direction

JTAER, Vol. 18, Pages 2163-2187: COVID-19 and Supply Chain Disruption Management: A Behavioural Economics Perspective and Future Research Direction

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research doi: 10.3390/jtaer18040109

Authors: Chase Smith Hajar Fatorachian

The COVID-19 pandemic has been one of the most severe disruptions to normal life, impacting how businesses operate. The academic literature in the areas of supply chain and operations management has been trying to explain how this has affected decision-making in businesses. However, the existing literature has predominantly overlooked organisational culture and behavioural economic theories. This paper contends that considering the decisions made in supply chain disruption management involve groups and the individuals within them, the relevance of behavioural economic concepts becomes paramount. As such, the objective of this paper is to conduct an integrative literature review, utilising the purposive sampling method to explore the dearth of academic work connecting behavioural economic theories and organisational culture to supply chain disruption management. Additionally, the paper aims to offer guidelines for future research in this domain. Enhancing our comprehension of these domains concerning supply chain disruption management would empower firms to better anticipate their parties’ decisions, refine their decision-making models, and cultivate stronger relationships with suppliers and customers.

A Business Acquisition Case on Jollibee Foods Corporation’s Purchase of Mang Inasal

Asian Journal of Management Cases, Ahead of Print.
This case is about the largest quick-service restaurant (QSR) conglomerate in the Philippines, Jollibee Foods Corporation (JFC), acquiring its fastest growing competitor Mang Inasal (MI). At a time when MI was on its best trajectory toward expansion and financial growth, its CEO, Edgar Sia, sold 70% of the company to the market leader for P3 billion in 2010 and the remaining 30% of the stake for P2 billion in 2016—whopping amounts which, in the eyes of JFC Management, were reasonable enough to fully acquire a highly prized company. Organizing information drawn from public sources, the author wrote this case to encourage intellectual discourse among students and professors of business as they critically analyse the acquisition decision, both from the standpoint of MI and JFC.

JTAER, Vol. 18, Pages 2142-2162: Enhancing Traceability in Wine Supply Chains through Blockchain: A Stackelberg Game-Theoretical Analysis

JTAER, Vol. 18, Pages 2142-2162: Enhancing Traceability in Wine Supply Chains through Blockchain: A Stackelberg Game-Theoretical Analysis

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research doi: 10.3390/jtaer18040108

Authors: Yuxuan Kang Xianliang Shi Xiongping Yue Weijian Zhang Samuel Shuai Liu

Blockchain technology has been adopted to improve traceability and authenticity in wine supply chains (WSCs). However, whether through outsourcing or self-implementation of a blockchain-based wine traceability system (BTS), there are significant costs involved, as well as concerns regarding consumer privacy. Motivated by observations of real-world practice, we explore the value of blockchain in enhancing traceability and authenticity in WSCs through a Stackelberg game-theoretical analysis. By comparing the equilibrium solutions of the scenarios with and without blockchain, we uncover the value of blockchain in tracing wine products. Our findings show that blockchain adoption can increase WSC prices under certain conditions. We derive the threshold for a third-party BTS service fee that determines blockchain adoption for tracing wine products and reveal the moderating effect of consumer traceability preferences and privacy concerns. Furthermore, the investigation of who should lead the implementation of BTS finds that the equal cost sharing between the manufacturer and the retailer results in no difference in BTS implementation leadership. Otherwise, the manufacturer always benefits from taking the lead in the implementation of BTS, and the retailer should undertake a leadership role in BTS implementation if they need to bear higher costs.

VRL Logistics Limited: Investment Dilemma Amidst the Global Pandemic

Asian Journal of Management Cases, Ahead of Print.
The case examined the investment dilemma faced by the portfolio manager Mr Thomas George of a leading wealth management company regarding investments in VRL Logistics Limited, a leading logistics company in India. As part of the portfolio evaluation and rebalancing exercise, the portfolio manager had to take a call on whether to retain VRL Logistics Limited in the portfolio or exit the stock. The share price had seen a drastic increase from ₹161.55 to ₹282 at the time of reviewing the portfolio. The logistics sector was one of the major sectors affected due to the lockdown announced by the Government on account of the global pandemic. With the imminent threat of multiple waves and lockdowns, determining the intrinsic value amidst the global pandemic poses a challenge to the portfolio manager. The case employed different methods of valuation, such as discounted cash flow and relative valuation, to arrive at the fair value of the stock. The case also discussed incorporating ‘risk’ in the valuation exercise by performing a sensitivity analysis of key variables.